Program Evaluation

    We hope you enjoyed the course. The following information will be used to evaluate and improve the program so that services provided are of the highest quality possible. We very much appreciate your feedback. Thank you!

    What is your current professional status (check all that apply):

    Doctoral-level PsychologistMarriage and Family TherapistCounselorLicensed Marriage and Family TherapistLicensed Clinical Social WorkerPsychiatristOther (please specify):

    Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

    1
    Not at All

    2

    3

    4

    5
    Very Much

    As a result of this learning activity, to what extent are you able to:

    1: Describe the “triangle of conflict” and how it might be applied in the treatment of anxiety or depression.

    2: Summarize how an affect-based psychodynamic psychotherapy was applied for adolescents in an 8-week online format.

    3: Describe at least two areas that improved as a result of the treatment.

    Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

    1
    Very Little

    2

    3

    4

    5
    Great Deal

    How satisfied were you with this CE program?

    How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

    Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

    1
    Not Useful

    2

    3

    4

    5
    Extremely Useful

    How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

    How useful do you perceive this knowledge to be to psychological practice, education, and/or science?

    Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

    1
    Not at All

    2

    3

    4

    5
    Very Much

    The authors/instructors were knowledgeable and demonstrated expertise in the subject.

    The authors/instructors were effective in presenting the material.

    The material was presented effectively, in a manner conducive to my learning.

    We are also interested in knowing how well we are doing in terms of other factors, including but not limited to: showing current scientific empirical support in our courses; describing the accuracy and utility of materials, their empirical basis, and limitations; demonstrating respect for diversity and addressing the applicability of material to diverse populations; maintaining standards that are appropriate for a postdoctoral level of training in psychology; addressing any potential severe or common risks; and addressing any possible conflicts of interest. Please let us know how we are doing and about anything we could improve:

    Finally, please also rate the following items, using the scale below:

    1
    Not at All

    2

    3

    4

    5
    Very Much

    The program administrators were responsive and helpful.

    How good was the quality of the audio and/or visual files? (leave blank if not applicable)

    How accessible were the written materials (e.g., journal article, transcript, etc.). (leave blank if not applicable)

    Approximately how many hours did it take you to complete the program?

    Please share any additional feedback: