We hope you enjoyed the course. The following information will be used to evaluate and improve the program so that services provided are of the highest quality possible. We very much appreciate your feedback. Thank you!

What is your current professional status (check all that apply):

Doctoral-level PsychologistCounselorLicensed Marriage and Family TherapistLicensed Clinical Social WorkerPsychiatristOther (please specify):

Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

As a result of this learning activity, to what extent are you able to:

1: Describe the theoretical basis for traditional couch seating in classical psychoanalysis. —Please choose an option—12345

2: Identify two possible benefits of facilitating eye contact through face-to-face seating in psychoanalysis, based on neurobiological research. —Please choose an option—12345

3: Identify a situation in which couch seating may be beneficial in psychoanalysis, based on neurobiological research. —Please choose an option—12345

Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

How satisfied were you with this CE program? —Please choose an option—12345

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? —Please choose an option—12345

Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? —Please choose an option—12345

How useful do you perceive this knowledge to be to psychological practice, education, and/or science? —Please choose an option—12345

Please rate the following items, using the scale below:

The instructor and/or authors were knowledgeable and demonstrated expertise in the subject. —Please choose an option—12345

The instructor and/or authors were effective in presenting the material. —Please choose an option—12345

The material was presented effectively, in a manner conducive to my learning. —Please choose an option—12345

We are also interested in knowing how well we are doing in terms of other factors, including but not limited to: showing current scientific empirical support in our courses; describing the accuracy and utility of materials, their empirical basis, and limitations; demonstrating respect for diversity and addressing the applicability of material to diverse populations; maintaining standards that are appropriate for a postdoctoral level of training in psychology; addressing any potential severe or common risks; and addressing any possible conflicts of interest. Please let us know how we are doing and about anything we could improve:

Finally, please also rate the following items, using the scale below:

The program administrators were responsive and helpful. —Please choose an option—12345

How good was the quality of the audio and/or visual files? (leave blank if not applicable) —Please choose an option—12345

How accessible were the written materials (e.g., journal article, transcript, etc.). (leave blank if not applicable) —Please choose an option—12345

Approximately how many hours did it take you to complete the program?

Please share any additional feedback: